Marijuana News
| Top Story: Lies Have Consequences: Police Targeted Anti-Prohibitionist Reporter Because They Believed Lies Told By Their Superiors – Who Are Shocked, Of Course. | ||
| Posted by Richard Cowan on 2005-02-08 16:20:00 | ||
| Source: | ||
| | ||
| Posted February 8, 2005 MarijuanaNews usually focuses on the impact of the huge prohibitionist propaganda industry on the victims of cannabis prohibition. Sometimes it appears to be aimed at the general public, especially when there is an initiative to allow the medical use of cannabis or to lesson penalties for possession. Even then, it is not clear that the real target is the public, because the prohibitionist establishment has made clear its indifference to election results. However, we should not overlook the impact of this propaganda on the rank and file narks, and law enforcement in general, which extends all the way to the top of the political system, especially in the Bush Administration, but also in Canada and other countries. One aspect of the police subculture is the common belief that they are in a better position to know “the real facts” about whatever the politicians dump on them. For example, more than once I have heard narks say that the Dutch police are “really” opposed to the Dutch coffee shop system, if one talks to them in private. Ostensibly, that is something that only a visiting nark would be in a position to do. Consequently, in 1993, on my first trip to Amsterdam when I was national director of NORML I made a point of meeting with the head of the city’s “vice” squad. He made very clear that alcohol was the real problem for the police. Generally, the Dutch police are strong supporters of cannabis legalization, which is why the system is safe, at least for the times being. Actually, there are plenty of cops who are opposed to cannabis prohibition, and increasingly to the drug war itself, even in DEAland. However, in the insular and conformist world in which the police are locked, drug war dissenters generally find it advisable to keep their doubts to themselves. In Edmonton, Alberta, this process has been taken to its “logical” conclusion. Seven senior officers took it upon themselves to target a reporter for the Edmonton Sun, who was described as a “critic” of the police. In fact, reporter Kerry Diotte was critical of cannabis prohibition. Diotte and Edmonton police commission chairman Martin Ignasiak were attending a Canadian Association of Journalists meeting at an Edmonton bar, and the seven cops had planned on catching them in a DUI roadblock when they left. There were even two cops in the bar watching them. The other cops made the really dumb - and arrogant - mistake of talking about the trap on the police radio. The transcripts of the radio transmission showed their complete contempt for the rights of their targets. (They had even put Diotte’s home under surveillance.) However, their plans went awry when both targets (actually called “T1” and “T2” by the cops) took taxis home. The best laid traps of narks and men… Yesterday, the Edmonton Police Chief Fred Rayner, took “sick leave.” As one politician quipped, “Is it his doctor's advice or his lawyer's advice?” It’s not the crime, but the cover up…. It seems that last week the Chief issued a report that cleared the seven cops of improper action, but then someone leaked the transcripts of their police radio conversations that proved that the Chief was lying. Of course, everyone is professing to being “shocked.” Perhaps even more “shocking” was the statements by Leroy Chahley, who was Edmonton police chief from 1987 to 1990. “It's not so serious that heads should roll,” Chahley said. Seven cops conspire to violate the rights of a journalist and the head of the police commission, but he doesn’t think they should be fired?! I wonder what he would say if they had been caught smoking cannabis. Indeed, his statement illustrates the depth of the problem in the police subculture. “If the police are going to do a sting, someone else should be caught besides the police… But personally, I'm very, very, very disappointed at the things that were said over the police radio that were incredibly inappropriate.” Inappropriate? Actually, I think that, given the history of the Edmonton police, their behavior was entirely “appropriate.” It is also “appropriate” that they targeted an anti-prohibitionist writer for a very prohibitionist tabloid. A similar process can be seen at work in British Columbia, where many newspapers give Rich Coleman, the province’s Solicitor General a platform for the most obvious lies. Coleman is in charge of all law enforcement in the province, even though his only qualification is that he was once an RCMP officer. He is not even an attorney and has no academic degree. Nonetheless, he is uncritically quoted again and again, especially in the small town papers, as he calls for “American-style penalties” for BC growers. February 3rd the Kelowna Daily Courier actually quoted Coleman as saying, “The grow-op business . . . trades kilo for kilo for cocaine in the U.S. It comes back into here as cocaine. It funds the meth labs that we're dealing with; it funds the gun trade… We know of guns that have been paid for by B.C. marijuana that have been used to shoot at our troops overseas in peacekeeping missions. It's that simple.” Kerry Diotte said on television yesterday that if something like this can happen to him, the average citizen would have no chance if targeted by vindictive police. Canadians need to realize that their personal freedom and even the sovereignty of Canada is being undermined by the US supported and directed prohibitionist propaganda campaign. I have been trying to document this process for several years. |


1 Comments:
Very well written! Based on the content of your blog, I think you might enjoy some of the articles at my stop drug addiction site and hope you will give it a peek.
Post a Comment
<< Home